<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iPod Hifidelity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.c-note.dk/2006/11/20/ipod-hifidelity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.c-note.dk/2006/11/20/ipod-hifidelity/</link>
	<description>Life really hates me.... mostly around tea time on a Sunday...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 Jun 2010 05:18:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Casper</title>
		<link>http://www.c-note.dk/2006/11/20/ipod-hifidelity/comment-page-1/#comment-1265</link>
		<dc:creator>Casper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 14:15:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c-note.dk/2006/11/20/ipod-hifidelity/#comment-1265</guid>
		<description>Yo,

Yep, I really like the idea about a tube base amplifier, but I have to say no thank you, at that price (would look really cool in my office at work:-))

Also when one look at other options for the iPod, and dedicated amplified speakers - auch. I know that Apple wants money everytime someone creates one of these wonders, but why on earth would I pay more that â‚¬150 for a speaker set which is worse than my â‚¬79 PC speakers..... Oh well it&#039;s probably the same thing as with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bang-olufsen.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;B&amp;O&lt;/a&gt; - very pretty, but extremly expensive, and not much better than Sony or Philips.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yo,</p>
<p>Yep, I really like the idea about a tube base amplifier, but I have to say no thank you, at that price (would look really cool in my office at work:-))</p>
<p>Also when one look at other options for the iPod, and dedicated amplified speakers &#8211; auch. I know that Apple wants money everytime someone creates one of these wonders, but why on earth would I pay more that â‚¬150 for a speaker set which is worse than my â‚¬79 PC speakers&#8230;.. Oh well it&#8217;s probably the same thing as with <a href="http://www.bang-olufsen.com/" rel="nofollow">B&amp;O</a> &#8211; very pretty, but extremly expensive, and not much better than Sony or Philips.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alphast</title>
		<link>http://www.c-note.dk/2006/11/20/ipod-hifidelity/comment-page-1/#comment-1264</link>
		<dc:creator>Alphast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 11:48:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c-note.dk/2006/11/20/ipod-hifidelity/#comment-1264</guid>
		<description>Hi mate,

This is obviously horribly overpriced for no interest at all. I am pretty sure there are other (and cheaper) ways to get a decent sound output on an Ipod.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi mate,</p>
<p>This is obviously horribly overpriced for no interest at all. I am pretty sure there are other (and cheaper) ways to get a decent sound output on an Ipod.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
